Difference between revisions of "Category talk:ClimateInterpretation ©"

From Linked Earth Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(New topic on Interpretation field -- ~~~~: new section)
 
(replied)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Since the two categories have essentially the same properties and range and both ultimately results in a climate interpretation for the variable, I propose to merge the two under an "interpretation" field.
 
Since the two categories have essentially the same properties and range and both ultimately results in a climate interpretation for the variable, I propose to merge the two under an "interpretation" field.
 +
 +
===Re: New topic on Interpretation field -- [[User:Nick mckay|Nick mckay]] ([[User talk:Nick mckay|talk]]) 14:37, 22 March 2017 (PDT)===
 +
 +
I agree, but propose that we include a term called "scope" in the interpretation metadata that allows users to specify climate, vs isotope vs some other type of interpretation

Revision as of 21:37, 22 March 2017

New topic on Interpretation field -- Deborah Khider (talk) 11:44, 16 March 2017 (PDT)

Since the two categories have essentially the same properties and range and both ultimately results in a climate interpretation for the variable, I propose to merge the two under an "interpretation" field.

Re: New topic on Interpretation field -- Nick mckay (talk) 14:37, 22 March 2017 (PDT)

I agree, but propose that we include a term called "scope" in the interpretation metadata that allows users to specify climate, vs isotope vs some other type of interpretation