Category talk:ClimateInterpretation ©

New topic on Interpretation field -- Deborah Khider (talk) 11:44, 16 March 2017 (PDT)

Since the two categories have essentially the same properties and range and both ultimately results in a climate interpretation for the variable, I propose to merge the two under an "interpretation" field.

Re: New topic on Interpretation field -- Nick mckay (talk) 14:37, 22 March 2017 (PDT)

I agree, but propose that we include a term called "scope" in the interpretation metadata that allows users to specify climate, vs isotope vs some other type of interpretation

Re: Re: New topic on Interpretation field -- Deborah Khider (talk) 21:48, 22 March 2017 (PDT)

Changed in the new ontology and "scope" added.