Difference between revisions of "Category talk:ClimateInterpretation ©"

From Linked Earth Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(replied)
 
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
I agree, but propose that we include a term called "scope" in the interpretation metadata that allows users to specify climate, vs isotope vs some other type of interpretation
 
I agree, but propose that we include a term called "scope" in the interpretation metadata that allows users to specify climate, vs isotope vs some other type of interpretation
 +
 +
====Re: Re: New topic on Interpretation field -- [[User:Khider|Deborah Khider]] ([[User talk:Khider|talk]]) 21:48, 22 March 2017 (PDT)====
 +
 +
Changed in the new ontology and "scope" added.

Latest revision as of 04:48, 23 March 2017

New topic on Interpretation field -- Deborah Khider (talk) 11:44, 16 March 2017 (PDT)

Since the two categories have essentially the same properties and range and both ultimately results in a climate interpretation for the variable, I propose to merge the two under an "interpretation" field.

Re: New topic on Interpretation field -- Nick mckay (talk) 14:37, 22 March 2017 (PDT)

I agree, but propose that we include a term called "scope" in the interpretation metadata that allows users to specify climate, vs isotope vs some other type of interpretation

Re: Re: New topic on Interpretation field -- Deborah Khider (talk) 21:48, 22 March 2017 (PDT)

Changed in the new ontology and "scope" added.