Difference between revisions of "Category talk:ClimateInterpretation ©"
From Linked Earth Wiki
Nick mckay (Talk | contribs) (replied) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I agree, but propose that we include a term called "scope" in the interpretation metadata that allows users to specify climate, vs isotope vs some other type of interpretation | I agree, but propose that we include a term called "scope" in the interpretation metadata that allows users to specify climate, vs isotope vs some other type of interpretation | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====Re: Re: New topic on Interpretation field -- [[User:Khider|Deborah Khider]] ([[User talk:Khider|talk]]) 21:48, 22 March 2017 (PDT)==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Changed in the new ontology and "scope" added. | ||
Latest revision as of 04:48, 23 March 2017
New topic on Interpretation field -- Deborah Khider (talk) 11:44, 16 March 2017 (PDT)
Since the two categories have essentially the same properties and range and both ultimately results in a climate interpretation for the variable, I propose to merge the two under an "interpretation" field.
Re: New topic on Interpretation field -- Nick mckay (talk) 14:37, 22 March 2017 (PDT)
I agree, but propose that we include a term called "scope" in the interpretation metadata that allows users to specify climate, vs isotope vs some other type of interpretation
Re: Re: New topic on Interpretation field -- Deborah Khider (talk) 21:48, 22 March 2017 (PDT)
Changed in the new ontology and "scope" added.
