Difference between revisions of "Category:Speleothem Working Group"
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
− | In the Linked Earth context, a [[:Category:Working_Group|working group]] (WG) is a self-organized coalition of knowledgeable experts, whose activities are governed [[:Category:Working_Group|herewith]]. This page is dedicated to the discussion of data and metadata standards for | + | In the Linked Earth context, a [[:Category:Working_Group|working group]] (WG) is a self-organized coalition of knowledgeable experts, whose activities are governed [[:Category:Working_Group|herewith]]. This page is dedicated to the discussion of data and metadata standards for [[:Category:Speleothem | speleothems]], and aims to formulate a set of recommendations for such a standard. |
Members of 'Speleothem Working Group'This working group has 4 members. | __MEMBERS__ | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
=== Chronology === | === Chronology === | ||
− | Please see the [[ | + | Please see the [[:CategoryChronologies_Working_Group| chronologies WG]] for generalities about U/Th dating or layer-counting. |
If challenges specific to dating speleothems exist, please list relevant metadata properties below. | If challenges specific to dating speleothems exist, please list relevant metadata properties below. | ||
+ | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references \> | <references \> |
Revision as of 16:52, 15 March 2017
Contents
Overview
In the Linked Earth context, a working group (WG) is a self-organized coalition of knowledgeable experts, whose activities are governed herewith. This page is dedicated to the discussion of data and metadata standards for speleothems, and aims to formulate a set of recommendations for such a standard.
__MEMBERS__
Specific tasks
We recommend that discussions focus on the following techniques, and explore potential commonalities.
For each chronology type, we recommend:
- structuring discussions around what scientific questions one would want to ask of the data
- listing essential, recommended, and optional information for:
- the measurements themselves
- any inference made from the measurements (e.g. calibration to temperature)
- the underlying uncertainties, and what those numbers correspond to (e.g. 1-sigma or 2-sigma?)
- provide an ideal data table for each type of observation, so the community knows what to report and how to report it.
- provide separate recommendations for new and legacy datasets
Things to describe
Observations
- stable isotopes
- trace metals
Hydrology
The interpretation of geochemical or lithological signals embedded in speleothem archives relies sometimes heavily on implicit assumptions about cave hydrology. What parameters need to be archived to enable long-term re-use and better information extraction from speleothem datasets? A few come to mind:
- karst residence time
- transit time distributions
- porosity
- soil thickness
Chronology
Please see the chronologies WG for generalities about U/Th dating or layer-counting. If challenges specific to dating speleothems exist, please list relevant metadata properties below.
References
This category currently contains no pages or media.