Difference between revisions of "Category:Trees Working Group"
(Created page with "Category:Working Group == Overview == In the Linked Earth context, a working group (WG) is a self-organized coalition of knowledgeable experts...") |
m (Add a link to the wood category) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
− | In the Linked Earth context, a [[:Category:Working_Group|working group]] (WG) is a self-organized coalition of knowledgeable experts, whose activities are governed [[:Category:Working_Group|herewith]]. This page is dedicated to the discussion of data and metadata standards for '''trees''', and aims to formulate a set of recommendations for such a standard. Note that chronological aspects should be discussed within the [[:Category:Chronologies_Working_Group|Chronologies WG]]. | + | In the Linked Earth context, a [[:Category:Working_Group|working group]] (WG) is a self-organized coalition of knowledgeable experts, whose activities are governed [[:Category:Working_Group|herewith]]. This page is dedicated to the discussion of data and metadata standards for '''trees''' (see [[:Category:Wood | this page]] for a definition of the wood archive]], and aims to formulate a set of recommendations for such a standard. Note that chronological aspects should be discussed within the [[:Category:Chronologies_Working_Group|Chronologies WG]]. |
Members of 'Trees Working Group'This working group has 7 members. | __MEMBERS__ |
Revision as of 18:00, 27 September 2016
Contents
Overview
In the Linked Earth context, a working group (WG) is a self-organized coalition of knowledgeable experts, whose activities are governed herewith. This page is dedicated to the discussion of data and metadata standards for trees (see this page for a definition of the wood archive]], and aims to formulate a set of recommendations for such a standard. Note that chronological aspects should be discussed within the Chronologies WG.
__MEMBERS__
Specific tasks
We recommend that discussions focus on the following techniques, and explore potential commonalities.
For each chronology type, we recommend:
- structuring discussions around what scientific questions one would want to ask of the data
- listing essential, recommended, and optional information for:
- the measurements themselves
- any inference made from the measurements (e.g. calibration to temperature)
- the underlying uncertainties, and what those numbers correspond to (e.g. 1-sigma or 2-sigma?)
- provide an ideal data table for each type of observation, so the community knows what to report and how to report it.
- provide separate recommendations for new and legacy datasets
Sensors
An initial recommendation is to focus on different sensors:
Tree rings
Detrending
How to document the type of detrending applied to enable reproducibility.
Stable water isotopes
Here are polls that the group might want to consider:
You are not entitled to view results of this poll.
References
This category currently contains no pages or media.