Difference between revisions of "Category:Speleothem Working Group"
From Linked Earth Wiki
( Pages with a poll, Working Group )
(Add a link to the speleothem category) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
− | In the Linked Earth context, a [[:Category:Working_Group|working group]] (WG) is a self-organized coalition of knowledgeable experts, whose activities are governed [[:Category:Working_Group|herewith]]. This page is dedicated to the discussion of data and metadata standards for '''speleothems''', and aims to formulate a set of recommendations for such a standard. Note that chronological aspects should be discussed within the [[:Category:Chronologies_Working_Group|Chronologies WG]]. | + | In the Linked Earth context, a [[:Category:Working_Group|working group]] (WG) is a self-organized coalition of knowledgeable experts, whose activities are governed [[:Category:Working_Group|herewith]]. This page is dedicated to the discussion of data and metadata standards for '''speleothems''' (see [[:Category:Speleothem | this page]] for a definition of the speleothem archive), and aims to formulate a set of recommendations for such a standard. Note that chronological aspects should be discussed within the [[:Category:Chronologies_Working_Group|Chronologies WG]]. |
Members of 'Speleothem Working Group'This working group has 4 members. | __MEMBERS__ |
Revision as of 18:05, 27 September 2016
Contents
Overview
In the Linked Earth context, a working group (WG) is a self-organized coalition of knowledgeable experts, whose activities are governed herewith. This page is dedicated to the discussion of data and metadata standards for speleothems (see this page for a definition of the speleothem archive), and aims to formulate a set of recommendations for such a standard. Note that chronological aspects should be discussed within the Chronologies WG.
__MEMBERS__
Specific tasks
We recommend that discussions focus on the following techniques, and explore potential commonalities.
For each chronology type, we recommend:
- structuring discussions around what scientific questions one would want to ask of the data
- listing essential, recommended, and optional information for:
- the measurements themselves
- any inference made from the measurements (e.g. calibration to temperature)
- the underlying uncertainties, and what those numbers correspond to (e.g. 1-sigma or 2-sigma?)
- provide an ideal data table for each type of observation, so the community knows what to report and how to report it.
- provide separate recommendations for new and legacy datasets
Things to describe
Observations
- stable isotopes
- trace metals
Hydrology
Polls
Here are polls that the group might want to consider:
What is your favorite poll?
You are not entitled to vote.
You are not entitled to view results of this poll.
You are not entitled to view results of this poll.
There was one vote since the poll was created on 22:22, 15 September 2016.
poll-id BF3DF6E5603AD176A34394AF9A9EAE30
References
This category currently contains no pages or media.