Difference between revisions of "Category talk:ClimateInterpretation ©"
From Linked Earth Wiki
(→New topic on Interpretation field -- ~~~~: new section) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Since the two categories have essentially the same properties and range and both ultimately results in a climate interpretation for the variable, I propose to merge the two under an "interpretation" field. | Since the two categories have essentially the same properties and range and both ultimately results in a climate interpretation for the variable, I propose to merge the two under an "interpretation" field. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Re: New topic on Interpretation field -- [[User:Nick mckay|Nick mckay]] ([[User talk:Nick mckay|talk]]) 14:37, 22 March 2017 (PDT)=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | I agree, but propose that we include a term called "scope" in the interpretation metadata that allows users to specify climate, vs isotope vs some other type of interpretation | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====Re: Re: New topic on Interpretation field -- [[User:Khider|Deborah Khider]] ([[User talk:Khider|talk]]) 21:48, 22 March 2017 (PDT)==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Changed in the new ontology and "scope" added. | ||
Latest revision as of 04:48, 23 March 2017
New topic on Interpretation field -- Deborah Khider (talk) 11:44, 16 March 2017 (PDT)
Since the two categories have essentially the same properties and range and both ultimately results in a climate interpretation for the variable, I propose to merge the two under an "interpretation" field.
Re: New topic on Interpretation field -- Nick mckay (talk) 14:37, 22 March 2017 (PDT)
I agree, but propose that we include a term called "scope" in the interpretation metadata that allows users to specify climate, vs isotope vs some other type of interpretation
Re: Re: New topic on Interpretation field -- Deborah Khider (talk) 21:48, 22 March 2017 (PDT)
Changed in the new ontology and "scope" added.
