Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Trees Working Group"
From Linked Earth Wiki
m (typo fix) |
(→initiated discussion on detrending -- JEG (talk) 17:35, 17 October 2016 (PDT)) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Cheers, | Cheers, | ||
[[User:Jeg|JEG]] | [[User:Jeg|JEG]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Re: initiated discussion on detrending -- [[User:Petebrew|Petebrew]] ([[User talk:Petebrew|talk]]) 10:22, 18 October 2016 (PDT)=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | I've put in some basics for what I think is needed, but isn't this a problem shared by all proxies? These are fairly standard mathematical techniques that I'd assume are used in other proxies too? | ||
Revision as of 17:22, 18 October 2016
initiated discussion on detrending -- JEG (talk) 17:35, 17 October 2016 (PDT)
First off, this page looks great - thanks to anyone who has contributed.
Re: detrending, this reminds me that in the rest of LinkedEarth, we encourage users to distinguished between native observations and any processed form thereof. Because detrending may result in a loss of information, I would encourage the group to describe:
- Guidelines to store raw data, for each measurement type
- Guidelines to store metadata about detrending method (e.g. method name, software implementation, parameter values, etc).
Cheers, JEG
Re: initiated discussion on detrending -- Petebrew (talk) 10:22, 18 October 2016 (PDT)
I've put in some basics for what I think is needed, but isn't this a problem shared by all proxies? These are fairly standard mathematical techniques that I'd assume are used in other proxies too?
