Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cross Archive Metadata - Legacy datasets"
From Linked Earth Wiki
Refer to this tutorial on how to participate in Discussions
(→-- ~~~~: new section) |
(→-- ~~~~: new section) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
In the LinkedEarth context, PaleoData refers to the y-axis of the dataset. It contains the information about the environment. The question remains: could a paleoclimate dataset not contain information about climate? | In the LinkedEarth context, PaleoData refers to the y-axis of the dataset. It contains the information about the environment. The question remains: could a paleoclimate dataset not contain information about climate? | ||
This seems paradoxical but we all do exploratory work on archive, perhaps obtaining a few dates to see if the samples correspond to a period of time we're interested in studying. These measurements fall under the chronology information of the archive but could be valuable down the line. | This seems paradoxical but we all do exploratory work on archive, perhaps obtaining a few dates to see if the samples correspond to a period of time we're interested in studying. These measurements fall under the chronology information of the archive but could be valuable down the line. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == -- [[User:Khider|Deborah Khider]] ([[User talk:Khider|talk]]) 20:53, 22 February 2017 (PST) == | ||
| + | |||
| + | For the same reason as stated in the paleoclimate discussion above, a dataset may not contain any chronological information. For instance, the PI may have done preliminary work on the archive. Should such a dataset end up on the wiki? | ||
Latest revision as of 04:53, 23 February 2017
-- Deborah Khider (talk) 20:53, 22 February 2017 (PST)
In the LinkedEarth context, PaleoData refers to the y-axis of the dataset. It contains the information about the environment. The question remains: could a paleoclimate dataset not contain information about climate? This seems paradoxical but we all do exploratory work on archive, perhaps obtaining a few dates to see if the samples correspond to a period of time we're interested in studying. These measurements fall under the chronology information of the archive but could be valuable down the line.
-- Deborah Khider (talk) 20:53, 22 February 2017 (PST)
For the same reason as stated in the paleoclimate discussion above, a dataset may not contain any chronological information. For instance, the PI may have done preliminary work on the archive. Should such a dataset end up on the wiki?
