Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Trees Working Group"
From Linked Earth Wiki
m (typo fix) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
First off, this page looks great - thanks to anyone who has contributed. | First off, this page looks great - thanks to anyone who has contributed. | ||
| − | Re: detrending, this reminds me that in the rest of LinkedEarth, we encourage users to distinguished between native observations and any processed form. Because detrending may result in a | + | Re: detrending, this reminds me that in the rest of LinkedEarth, we encourage users to distinguished between native observations and any processed form thereof. Because detrending may result in a loss of information, I would encourage the group to describe: |
# Guidelines to store raw data, for each measurement type | # Guidelines to store raw data, for each measurement type | ||
# Guidelines to store metadata about detrending method (e.g. method name, software implementation, parameter values, etc). | # Guidelines to store metadata about detrending method (e.g. method name, software implementation, parameter values, etc). | ||
| − | Cheers | + | Cheers, |
[[User:Jeg|JEG]] | [[User:Jeg|JEG]] | ||
Revision as of 17:37, 17 October 2016
initiated discussion on detrending -- JEG (talk) 17:35, 17 October 2016 (PDT)
First off, this page looks great - thanks to anyone who has contributed.
Re: detrending, this reminds me that in the rest of LinkedEarth, we encourage users to distinguished between native observations and any processed form thereof. Because detrending may result in a loss of information, I would encourage the group to describe:
- Guidelines to store raw data, for each measurement type
- Guidelines to store metadata about detrending method (e.g. method name, software implementation, parameter values, etc).
Cheers, JEG
