Difference between revisions of "Category:Trees Working Group"

From Linked Earth Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
( Pages with a poll, Working Group )
(Created page with "Category:Working Group == Overview == In the Linked Earth context, a working group (WG) is a self-organized coalition of knowledgeable experts...")
 
m (Add a link to the wood category)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
== Overview ==
 
== Overview ==
In the Linked Earth context, a [[:Category:Working_Group|working group]] (WG) is a self-organized coalition of knowledgeable experts, whose activities are governed [[:Category:Working_Group|herewith]]. This page is dedicated to the discussion of data and metadata standards for '''trees''', and aims to formulate a set of recommendations for such a standard. Note that chronological aspects should be discussed within the [[:Category:Chronologies_Working_Group|Chronologies WG]].
+
In the Linked Earth context, a [[:Category:Working_Group|working group]] (WG) is a self-organized coalition of knowledgeable experts, whose activities are governed [[:Category:Working_Group|herewith]]. This page is dedicated to the discussion of data and metadata standards for '''trees''' (see [[:Category:Wood | this page]] for a definition of the wood archive]], and aims to formulate a set of recommendations for such a standard. Note that chronological aspects should be discussed within the [[:Category:Chronologies_Working_Group|Chronologies WG]].
  
 

Members of 'Trees Working Group'

 
__MEMBERS__

Revision as of 18:00, 27 September 2016


Overview

In the Linked Earth context, a working group (WG) is a self-organized coalition of knowledgeable experts, whose activities are governed herewith. This page is dedicated to the discussion of data and metadata standards for trees (see this page for a definition of the wood archive]], and aims to formulate a set of recommendations for such a standard. Note that chronological aspects should be discussed within the Chronologies WG.

__MEMBERS__

Specific tasks

We recommend that discussions focus on the following techniques, and explore potential commonalities.

For each chronology type, we recommend:

  • structuring discussions around what scientific questions one would want to ask of the data
  • listing essential, recommended, and optional information for:
    • the measurements themselves
    • any inference made from the measurements (e.g. calibration to temperature)
    • the underlying uncertainties, and what those numbers correspond to (e.g. 1-sigma or 2-sigma?)
  • provide an ideal data table for each type of observation, so the community knows what to report and how to report it.
  • provide separate recommendations for new and legacy datasets


Sensors

An initial recommendation is to focus on different sensors:

Tree rings

Detrending

How to document the type of detrending applied to enable reproducibility.

Stable water isotopes

Here are polls that the group might want to consider:


What is your favorite poll?
You are not entitled to vote.
You are not entitled to view results of this poll.
There was one vote since the poll was created on 22:22, 15 September 2016.
poll-id BF3DF6E5603AD176A34394AF9A9EAE30


References

This category currently contains no pages or media.