Category talk:Working Group - Revision history

Khider at 04:52, 23 February 2017

2017-02-23T04:52:43Z

Khider at 04:52, 23 February 2017

2017-02-23T04:52:26Z

Khider: /* Should a paleoclimate dataset necessarily contain age information? -- ~~~~ */ new section

2016-10-06T20:41:10Z

‎Should a paleoclimate dataset necessarily contain age information? -- ~~~~: new section

Khider: /* Should a paleoclimate datasets necessarily contain paleodata information -- Deborah Khider (talk) 12:07, 6 October 2016 (PDT) */

2016-10-06T19:08:14Z

‎Should a paleoclimate datasets necessarily contain paleodata information -- Deborah Khider (talk) 12:07, 6 October 2016 (PDT)

Khider: /* Should a paleoclimate datasets necessarily contain paleodata information -- ~~~~ */ new section

2016-10-06T19:07:43Z

‎Should a paleoclimate datasets necessarily contain paleodata information -- ~~~~: new section

New page

== Should a paleoclimate datasets necessarily contain paleodata information -- [[User:Khider|Deborah Khider]] ([[User talk:Khider|talk]]) 12:07, 6 October 2016 (PDT) ==

In the LinkedEarth context, PaleoData refers to the y-axis of the dataset. It contains the information about the environment. The question remains: could a paleoclimate dataset not contain information about climate?

This seems paradoxical but we all do exploratory work on archive, perhaps obtaining a few dates to see if the samples correspond to a period of time we're interested in studying. These measurements fall under the chronology information of the archive but could be valuable down the line.

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:52, 23 February 2017
Line 12:		Line 12:

	For the same reason as stated in the paleoclimate discussion above, a dataset may not contain any chronological information. For instance, the PI may have done preliminary work on the archive. Should such a dataset end up on the wiki?		For the same reason as stated in the paleoclimate discussion above, a dataset may not contain any chronological information. For instance, the PI may have done preliminary work on the archive. Should such a dataset end up on the wiki?
		+
		+	===Re: Should a paleoclimate dataset necessarily contain age information? -- [[User:Khider\|Deborah Khider]] ([[User talk:Khider\|talk]]) 20:52, 22 February 2017 (PST)===
		+
		+	: Discussion moved to [[Cross Archive Metadata - Legacy datasets]] for legacy datasets and [[Cross Archive Metadata - New datasets]] for new datasets.

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 This seems paradoxical but we all do exploratory work on archive, perhaps obtaining a few dates to see if the samples correspond to a period of time we're interested in studying. These measurements fall under the chronology information of the archive but could be valuable down the line.
 == Should a paleoclimate dataset necessarily contain age information? -- [[User:Khider|Deborah Khider]] ([[User talk:Khider|talk]]) 13:41, 6 October 2016 (PDT) ==
 For the same reason as stated in the paleoclimate discussion above, a dataset may not contain any chronological information. For instance, the PI may have done preliminary work on the archive. Should such a dataset end up on the wiki?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:41, 6 October 2016
Line 4:		Line 4:

	This seems paradoxical but we all do exploratory work on archive, perhaps obtaining a few dates to see if the samples correspond to a period of time we're interested in studying. These measurements fall under the chronology information of the archive but could be valuable down the line.		This seems paradoxical but we all do exploratory work on archive, perhaps obtaining a few dates to see if the samples correspond to a period of time we're interested in studying. These measurements fall under the chronology information of the archive but could be valuable down the line.
		+
		+	== Should a paleoclimate dataset necessarily contain age information? -- [[User:Khider\|Deborah Khider]] ([[User talk:Khider\|talk]]) 13:41, 6 October 2016 (PDT) ==
		+
		+	For the same reason as stated in the paleoclimate discussion above, a dataset may not contain any chronological information. For instance, the PI may have done preliminary work on the archive. Should such a dataset end up on the wiki?

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-== Should a paleoclimate datasets necessarily contain paleodata information -- [[User:Khider|Deborah Khider]] ([[User talk:Khider|talk]]) 12:07, 6 October 2016 (PDT) ==
+== Should a paleoclimate dataset necessarily contain paleodata information? -- [[User:Khider|Deborah Khider]] ([[User talk:Khider|talk]]) 12:07, 6 October 2016 (PDT) ==
 In the LinkedEarth context, PaleoData refers to the y-axis of the dataset. It contains the information about the environment. The question remains: could a paleoclimate dataset not contain information about climate?
 This seems paradoxical but we all do exploratory work on archive, perhaps obtaining a few dates to see if the samples correspond to a period of time we're interested in studying. These measurements fall under the chronology information of the archive but could be valuable down the line.