Category talk:Marine Sediment Working Group - Revision history

Andreasschmittner at 20:44, 26 October 2017

2017-10-26T20:44:27Z

Andreasschmittner: /* -- ~~~~ */ new section

2017-10-26T20:43:31Z

‎-- ~~~~: new section

Andreasschmittner: Argument concerning depth reporting

2017-10-26T20:42:18Z

Argument concerning depth reporting

Andreasschmittner at 20:36, 26 October 2017

2017-10-26T20:36:08Z

Andreasschmittner: added question

2017-10-26T20:22:19Z

added question

Lukas: /* Foram geochemistry standards -- Lukas (talk) 02:52, 23 November 2016 (PST) */

2016-11-23T11:18:58Z

‎Foram geochemistry standards -- Lukas (talk) 02:52, 23 November 2016 (PST)

Lukas: /* Foram geochemistry standards -- ~~~~ */ new section

2016-11-23T10:52:56Z

‎Foram geochemistry standards -- ~~~~: new section

New page

== Foram geochemistry standards -- [[User:Lukas|Lukas]] ([[User talk:Lukas|talk]]) 02:52, 23 November 2016 (PST) ==

OK, I hope I'm doing this right. Somehow I find the wiki thing not very intuitive and I'm too lazy to find out how it really works...

Here's what I use for my own project. Since I'm working with legacy datasets there are only a few things that I consider essential (indicated with (E)), but I think we should push to make the remaining metadata fields at least recommended: 

Parameter (E) 
Parameter.type (E): measured or inferred 
Parameter.unit (E) 
Parameter.analytical.error: based on repeat measurement of standard, 1SD 
Parameter.reproducibility: based on repeat measurement of sample, 1SD 
Instrument 
Laboratory 
Species (E): in case of foraminifera 
Nshells.measured: number of shells used 
Size.fraction: size fraction of foraminifera shells 
Notes 
Habitat.Season: from paper 
Habitat.Depth: from paper. add epifaunal, infaunal for benthics 
Equilibrium.offset: from paper 
Calibration.eq: for inferred parameters 
Calibration.uncertainty 
Calibration.DOI 
Publication.DOI: publication(s) where data were reported 
Data.source (E): to allow tracing of legacy data, either DOI, link or ... 

For trace elements cleaning method would be a good one to include.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Foram geochemistry standards -- [[User:Lukas|Lukas]] ([[User talk:Lukas|talk]]) 02:52, 23 November 2016 (PST) ==
@@ Line 33: / Line 29: @@
 ==  -- [[User:Andreasschmittner|Andreasschmittner]] ([[User talk:Andreasschmittner|talk]]) 13:43, 26 October 2017 (PDT) ==
-gaga
+I wonder if we need a standard for core names.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:43, 26 October 2017
Line 30:		Line 30:

	For trace elements cleaning method would be a good one to include.		For trace elements cleaning method would be a good one to include.
		+
		+	== -- [[User:Andreasschmittner\|Andreasschmittner]] ([[User talk:Andreasschmittner\|talk]]) 13:43, 26 October 2017 (PDT) ==
		+
		+	gaga

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:42, 26 October 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I wonder if we need a standard for core names. (Andreas)		I wonder if we need a standard for core names. (Andreas)
		+
		+	With regard to depths reporting I would argue that having depth_top and depth_bottom precisely defines the interval and if only the mean depth is known one can indicate that by having the same value in both depth_top and depth_bottom.

	== Foram geochemistry standards -- [[User:Lukas\|Lukas]] ([[User talk:Lukas\|talk]]) 02:52, 23 November 2016 (PST) ==		== Foram geochemistry standards -- [[User:Lukas\|Lukas]] ([[User talk:Lukas\|talk]]) 02:52, 23 November 2016 (PST) ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:36, 26 October 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	I wonder if we need a standard for core names.	+	I wonder if we need a standard for core names. (Andreas)

	== Foram geochemistry standards -- [[User:Lukas\|Lukas]] ([[User talk:Lukas\|talk]]) 02:52, 23 November 2016 (PST) ==		== Foram geochemistry standards -- [[User:Lukas\|Lukas]] ([[User talk:Lukas\|talk]]) 02:52, 23 November 2016 (PST) ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:22, 26 October 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	I wonder if we need a standard for core names.
		+
	== Foram geochemistry standards -- [[User:Lukas\|Lukas]] ([[User talk:Lukas\|talk]]) 02:52, 23 November 2016 (PST) ==		== Foram geochemistry standards -- [[User:Lukas\|Lukas]] ([[User talk:Lukas\|talk]]) 02:52, 23 November 2016 (PST) ==

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 OK, I hope I'm doing this right. Somehow I find the wiki thing not very intuitive and I'm too lazy to find out how it really works...
-Here's what I use for my own project. Since I'm working with legacy datasets there are only a few things that I consider essential (indicated with (E)), but I think we should push to make the remaining metadata fields at least recommended:<br />
+Here's what I use for my own project; I don't distinguish between stable isotopes, Mg/Ca and trace elements when it comes to metadata. Since I'm working with legacy datasets there are only a few things that I consider essential (indicated with (E)), but I think we should push to make the remaining metadata fields at least recommended:<br />
 Parameter (E)<br />